Alaska Outdoor Supersite: Alaska outdoor information
Home
Site Map
Directory -- Businesses serving the Alaska outdoors industry
Areas -- Information about Alaska outdoor areas
Forum
Fishing -- Information about fishin in Alaska
Hunting -- Information about Alaska hunting
Magazine -- Articles and photos about the Alaska outdoors
Products
Who is OAC?
   
* New on
  OutdoorsDirectory.com
* News & tips by email:
  Alaska Outdoors mailing list
* Email notification of new
  Alaska books and video

 

Terrain Navigator
CD ROM topographic map coverage for ALL of Alaska

 Terrain Navigator 2001

Click for more information


Complete Catalogs

Alaska Hunting Books
Alaska Fishing Books
Alaska Travel Books

Plan Your
Alaska Trip
with The Milepost

The Milepost

Click here for more information or to
order your copy


Hunting forum

The Alaska
Hunting Forum

[ Return to Contents | Post a Reply | Post a new message ]


lets cut the rhetoric
Posted by fullkurl on Oct 13 2005
Lets hears some real world numbers as to the hunter take of the CAH.  I'm tired of hearing "the herd cant sustain additional pressure"  sounds like a load of rhetorical cr*p. WHAT IS THE EXACT TAKE FROM HUNTERS? (on average) Would 750 hunters who, say put in and win  a "Haul road ATV draw" (or maybe simply a registration hunt)do harm to a herd this size? The state cant send out a mailer (paid for via that draw or registration) that could instruct and warn these hunters of the cost/heavy fines of trail mismanagement?
And the tier talk is bogus. The ATV hunt would close and things would be status quo.  I dont buy that argument. The Nelchina taught F+G a few things. (overharvest, predator abundance etc.)Atv use is still in play there, the Tangle Lakes still look great.
And lets hear from someone other than Jack Reakoff please. Lets get some unbiased, or bipartisan proposed herd numbers. If the numbers bear out an imperilled herd, OK, I'm hearing that and say NO to additional access or pressure, period. I enjoyed my hike-in hunt this year, and I'll do it again the same way.  
The asthetic argument is almost laughable.  The myriad of pipeline equipment:   pipes, tubes, wires, waste dumps, trucks, trailers, enclosed fences, service roads, enbankments, small equipment etc. This is the cost of oil production and thats fine, but we are arguing about what could constitue a single loop trail around an area probably not even visible to 99.9% of the people around there.  Lets get real.
Drive to Prudhoe, view the hundreds of thousands of acres out there, maybe millions! All off of 125 miles of desolate road.  Many are acting like this is a 300 acre central park.
A non anadromous creek bed access trail up north would dispense with the gouged tundra rhetoric completely.  The park service utilizes ATV trails in creekbeds and the system works.  Lets dispense with the rhetoric until a plan is presented.  If the plan stinks, ok, unlease the hounds!



Previous: AOC and SB 85---public access off the Dalton bushrat Oct 12 2005
Next: status quo TradBow Oct 14 2005

Message Thread:


Post a Reply

Posting to this forum is now disabled. Please visit our new forums


Alaska outdoors ~ home | Areas | Magazine | Directory | Alaska outdoors forums | Alaska boating
Alaska hunting | Alaska fishing | Alaska Outdoors Store | Site Map | About Us

© 1996 Outdoors America Communications
PO Box 609-W, Delta Junction, AK 99737
Tel. (907) 895-4919

forums@outdoorsdirectory.com