![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Terrain Navigator Complete Catalogs Alaska
Hunting Books Plan Your Click
here
for more information or to |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Alaska |
|
[ Return to Contents | Post a Reply | Post a new message ] Thought Process Posted by Jake_65_65 on Dec 05 2005 First let me reply to the guy that said most young guys will just leave and never come back after being sent to the archives. Way back when I first started reading this site (roughly last year 20 then, 21 now) I was sent to the archives for asking a question about the correct firearm for bear correction. Well I actually went, did a lot of research and got a lot of useful information. I also searched extensivly on the internet and skimmed thorugh many of my father's books. My thought process started with a big bore handgun and we both (father and I) decided the 480 ruger was a good choice with reloaded ammunition. My main use for this gun was for my fishing trips which consisted of mostly highway access and entailed hiking to certain spots. I felt good about this decision for a while, but started to wonder if I could develop a profciency level that I was comfortable with and I wont go into how inferior ballisticly handguns are to long guns. I soon came to the conclusion that I wanted a long gun, and went through the whole ballistics debate with my father who already owned a 416 remington magnum. I soon settled on the 375 H&H in a Winchester model 70 (almost bought it down at wal-mart too). I finally came to back to the 480 Ruger because I wanted a gun that I could hike and fish with it on me at all times and my father already had the 416. I really feared that if I took a long gun with me it would end up on sitting on a log when I really needed it. Did I sacrifice a lot? You bet your ass I did, but I also put in the time at the range and the reloading bench to develop a round and a profinciency that I felt comfortable with. I will end with some observations that I have noticed through reading this forum and books on bear attacks. 1. Bears are not predicatble. Previous: Another opinion martyv Dec 06 2005 Next: Thanks, Jake! Michael Strahan Dec 05 2005 Message Thread:
|
|
Alaska outdoors
~ home |
Areas |
Magazine
| Directory |
Alaska outdoors forums |
Alaska boating © 1996 Outdoors America Communications |