|
[ Return to Contents
| Post a Reply
| Post a new message
]
so........
Posted by twodux on Mar 03 2006
So Barron, are you espousing that when area A is down in herd #s we all move to area B and knock it down, then move on to area C etc.? That sounds a lot like some of the unethical transporters method of operation, saturate an area and when it's no longer productive, move on.
If you think about it, if you live out of the area and only the locals can hunt there, or nobody can hunt there, it still means the same thing to you. You can't hunt there. So why would you have a problem? Do you have a problem when an area is drawing only but you don't get drawn? It's the same result again. Someone else gets to hunt there and you don't.
If you can afford to travel to do your hunting, why do you have a problem with people who can't afford to travel to hunt getting a chance to hunt near home? You can go somewhere else to get your hunting in. They can't. In fact, I'm sure a lot of those same people envy you. If the local area gets shut down totally, you can still hunt, but they can't. You actually seem to have an advantage. Is that fair?
Previous: To who? Barron Mar 03 2006
Next: My logic is undeniable. Barron Mar 04 2006
 Message Thread:
|
