Alaska Outdoor Supersite: Alaska outdoor information
Home
Site Map
Directory -- Businesses serving the Alaska outdoors industry
Areas -- Information about Alaska outdoor areas
Forum
Fishing -- Information about fishin in Alaska
Hunting -- Information about Alaska hunting
Magazine -- Articles and photos about the Alaska outdoors
Products
Who is OAC?
   
* New on
  OutdoorsDirectory.com
* News & tips by email:
  Alaska Outdoors mailing list
* Email notification of new
  Alaska books and video

 

Terrain Navigator
CD ROM topographic map coverage for ALL of Alaska

 Terrain Navigator 2001

Click for more information


Complete Catalogs

Alaska Hunting Books
Alaska Fishing Books
Alaska Travel Books

Plan Your
Alaska Trip
with The Milepost

The Milepost

Click here for more information or to
order your copy


Hunting forum

The Alaska
Hunting Forum

[ Return to Contents | Post a Reply | Post a new message ]


basing moose densities on personal data
Posted by bushrat on Mar 23 2006
375ultramag,

A biologist once told me that "nobody – not me, not you, not an expert native moose hunter who was born in the bush and has lived there all his life, not any other biologist, nobody, can reliably determine moose numbers and trends without a formal, carefully-executed censusing procedure (direct counting with appropriate sightability corrections can suffice for small areas in lieu of a sampling procedure)."

At first I thought, "What? Who is he to tell me that after living, hunting and trapping in the same area for over 20 years, that I can't really say diddly about the moose densities?!" But I came to realize that he was right. I don't know what's over the next hill, in the next drainage. I see things from the ground and don't cover very much of a game-management sub-unit. And frankly, some years I would have said there were hardly any moose, while other years I would have said there were plenty, based on my own observations. There is a cyclic nature to game populations as well that many don't take into account...we need to look at trends as well, numbers over many years, seasonal shifts, migrations, weather changes that influence things.  

Gist of it is, Sam, that you are basing moose densities in an area wholly based on personal experience hunting there. And that really means nothing in the overall scope of things. While it is your opinion that there are plenty of moose there, it is possible for your party to "tag out" in a low-density area. But for every guy like you who is successful, there is another guy who isn't, and who comes back to town and says the opposite. Who to believe? You? Him? Or the biologist who actually gets in the air and does a density estimate unit-wide?

We can't base moose densities on one individual's experiences hunting for a week or two every fall in an area.  
Mark

Previous: Yukon moose hunters have really lost the battle n 375ultramag Mar 22 2006
Next: Good Post Bushrat 375ultramag Mar 24 2006

Message Thread:


Post a Reply

Posting to this forum is now disabled. Please visit our new forums


Alaska outdoors ~ home | Areas | Magazine | Directory | Alaska outdoors forums | Alaska boating
Alaska hunting | Alaska fishing | Alaska Outdoors Store | Site Map | About Us

© 1996 Outdoors America Communications
PO Box 609-W, Delta Junction, AK 99737
Tel. (907) 895-4919

forums@outdoorsdirectory.com